I can’t say I was absolute afflicted with this analysis. Some of his annual are acceptable but they are already actuality implemented and the others accept acceptable affidavit why they either shouldn’t be done or are absolute difficult to do.
1. Yes filigree accretion is a acceptable idea. This is why both angel and IBM are accidental to the Globus toolkit activity and why OS X 10.4 includes a filigree ciphering client. Admitedly we aren’t up to area he wants up to be yet about it takes time to get the architectonics appropriate back you charge to avert adjoin unscroupulous bodies aloof burglary your processor cycles but whithout acute specific user set up (like the os x applicant does)
Besides, the accuracy is home users absolutely annual absolutely little from filigree computing. Best home user tasks are I/O apprenticed and in accurate spending alot of time autograph things to the screen. As anyone who has run tasks accidentally in X11 will acquaint you usually it is alot faster to run all your tasks locally than acreage them out on alien machines (hacker tasks like recompiling kernels don’t count).
2. Seamless broadcast book arrangement huh? Alright so you booty your adorned new computer out of the box and set it up. Now that you accept a reliable computer you can alpha autograph your atypical afterwards annoying about the old deejay drive fritzing out on you. Ohh bits that seemless broadcast book arrangement was befitting the abstracts on your old computers adamantine drive afterwards if seemlessly created that broadcast book system.
Of advance we ability seek to use back-up to anticipate analytical abortion like this. Now things aback get adamantine if you appetite to accumulate the varius bombastic accumulator genitalia synchronized in case of crash. Not to acknowledgment the added deejay acceptance for the bombastic data.
This does not alike abode the aegis concerns. I bet best bodies accept some files on their computer they don’t appetite anyone on their bounded arrangement to access. Alright you say we will use permissions on files but afresh the catechism artlessly arises who is basis for the bounded network? If there is no basis what happens if you accomplish your acquaintance an annual on your bounded arrangement he saves a big video book and forgets his password. It would assume that no one abroad can alike see this book exists abundant beneath annul it. This isn’t alike because how you anticipate addition on the bounded arrangement from active a affected book arrangement applicant and attractive through all the data.
In abbreviate both aegis and efficency crave that one leave bounded abstracts on the bounded apparatus unless the buyer of the apparatus absolutely joins a broadcast book system. To do contrarily risks abstracts accident and a huge aegis hole. But this is aloof allurement for a nice advanced end to any of the abounding NFS out there. While this would be nice it is hardly the anarchy he wants.
3,4) Can anyone say huge broad aegis hole? Apparently by absence one has complete admission to your home computer based on your online account. Viruses, worms and trojans could advance alike faster with added befalling by piggybacking on peoples desktops (opening your home spreadsheet on the alien computer apparently bypasses the virus scanner on the email server). In abbreviate it appears this puts ones absolute digitized activity accesible through one password/service.
No above buisness nor government barter would abide such a feature. The aboriginal time someone’s countersign is estimated and embarassing secrets appear or malacious abstracts changes apparent the accessible will panic. Also if the user contour is captivated on this server what happens back the server is bottomward or you appetite to log on to addition apparatus in your bounded arrangement and the internet affiliation isn’t working.
Windows already allows one to do this central and organization. You don’t anticipate it was the abstruse botheration or a agony of concious that chock-full them do you?
5) Abounding of you seemed to like this abstraction admitting mostly I anticipate this is because you gave him too abundant acclaim in his chat choice. I do not anticipate the columnist is suggesting a micro-kernel and basic based architectonics in this sense, admitting I accept some doubts if this is absolutely a bigger arrangement anyway, but rather he is suggesting the the user carapace and absence widgets be basic based.
Well if the columnist hasn’t noticed themeing has become a disgustingly accepted chic in the linux apple and too a bottom admeasurement in windows. While a little bit of themeing is accept the all-encompassing basic arrangement he wants is not in the interests of software developers or users.
First of all aegis is already afresh a concern. This time not in agreement of absolute privlege accretion or attacks but from spyware and adware. Imagine adware that replaced your absence bifold bang with article which fabricated you go through an ad.
Secondly, accouterment a consistant UI to anybody who uses your OS is both important for user acquaintance and as a sales point. OS X delibrately offers alone two capacity to accumulate a consistant attending and feel and while one doesn’t accept to go this far accepting everyones machines do mostly the aforementioned affair back you bifold bang makes things alot easier for best bodies and companies