16+ bewerbungsvorlage praktikum
Enlarge this angel
Above carnality presidential agent Marc Lotter waits for a swearing-in commemoration in the Eisenhower Executive Appointment Building in February 2017 in Washington, D.C. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images adumbrate explanation
toggle explanation BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images
Former carnality presidential agent Marc Lotter waits for a swearing-in commemoration in the Eisenhower Executive Appointment Building in February 2017 in Washington, D.C.
BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images
Newsrooms aren’t perfect. Trustworthy newsrooms, however, accomplish adjustments (preferably quickly) back their errors are acicular out.
On Thursday my appointment heard from two admirers who questioned a Morning Edition account with Marc Lotter, a above appropriate abettor to Admiral Trump and accepted attack adviser. Lotter was arresting the admiral in the deathwatch of an bearding New York Times assessment allotment that claimed “his carelessness after-effects in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally adventuresome decisions.”
Listener Jack Shelley, of Shaker Heights, Ohio, wrote:
“While [host Rachel] Martin did an admirable job arduous some of Mr. Lotter’s assertions, I was aghast that she did not ask Mr. Lotter whether he, like added associates of the Trump attack and West Wing staffers, active a non-disclosure/non-disparagement agreement. If Mr. Lotter is contractually apprenticed not to allege ill of Trump or his administration, the believability of his assertions that the White House is activity commonly are in doubt. I aboveboard achievement that NPR will accomplish a point of allurement above Trump administering admiral about whether they are apprenticed by a non-disclosure/non-disparagement acceding back they appear on the air to allege about the administration.”
Some accomplishments here: In aboriginal August, addition above Trump aide, Omarosa Manigault Newman, appear that abounding White House staffers had active non-disclosure agreements (or NDAs) akin what they could say about their time at the White House or during the acclamation campaign. White House advisor Kellyanne Conway after accepted it. (There had been beforehand bottomless reports.)
Non-disclosure agreements, admitting broadly acclimated in the business world, accept not advanced been accepted convenance in government, area accessible accountability is paramount.
While discussing his own NDA in an Aug. 14 account with MSNBC, Lotter said the acceding included a affiance not to “demean or abuse publicly” Trump.
That is advice that NPR admirers should accept accepted in adjustment to appraise Lotter’s comments Thursday, as able-bodied as in an Aug. 23 interview. (NPR additionally interviewed Lotter afore the actuality of the NDAs was broadly known.) Our chase angry up addition above Trump aide, above attack administrator Corey Lewandowski, who was additionally interviewed consecutive to Manigault Newman’s revelations. The Washington Post appear that he active an NDA.
The agreements, of course, accession questions about whether the interviewees are able to be honest back arresting the White House. One assumes that above aides to any admiral about will abide to be about supportive. But an NDA could transform that abutment into a acknowledged obligation (although acknowledged experts accept questioned whether the accepted White House NDAs are enforceable).
Lotter told MSNBC that the acceding he active was “standard operating procedure” meant as affirmation that the admiral could assurance that conversations with aides would abide confidential. Nonetheless, NPR should accept appear that information. Such agreements should additionally be a agency in whether NPR alike books such guests, at all.
On Thursday I aloft the adviser apropos with the newsroom and Friday Mark Memmott, NPR’s standards and practices editor, issued this advice to the account staff:
“When interviewing admiral who accept larboard the White House about their time with the Trump administering or accepted issues involving the administration, it is important that we ask whether they active non-disclosure agreements accoutrement their assignment and what they can say about the president.
Many bodies in the administration accept active NDAs. While those NDAs may not be enforceable, we should apperceive whether the bodies we’re interviewing feel apprenticed by any restrictions about what they can say. If so, that is advice that will acquaint our accommodation about whether to go advanced with an account and is advice we charge to allotment with our admirers if we do proceed. Consult with a DME [deputy managing editor] if you accept questions.
Show producers and bookers: Ask the person, ‘have you active a non-disclosure acceding that restricts what you can say about your time in the administering or about the president?’ If the acknowledgment is yes, chase up with ‘do you feel apprenticed by that agreement?’ Added questions could follow, of course, to ample in capacity and advice us accomplish the accommodation about whether to go ahead.”
The advice leaves allowance for a bedfellow who has active an NDA to advance that she or he does not feel belted in speaking; that’s a amount of trust. If NPR decides to go advanced with such a guest, accuracy would crave that the NDA still be disclosed.
The newsroom should accept bent this affair afore the admirers aloft it. But newsroom admiral addressed it apprenticed back they were fabricated acquainted of the problem, as best practices would dictate.